Redoubt Forge vs Hyperproof.

Platform Comparison

Both platforms manage compliance across multiple frameworks. The difference: Hyperproof manages compliance programs through workflows and evidence tracking. Redoubt Forge generates compliance from security posture: scan, harden, monitor, prove.

Build. Deploy. Monitor. Prove.

Hyperproof manages compliance programs through GRC workflows, evidence requests, and cross-framework control mapping. Redoubt Forge covers all four phases: scan and find gaps, deploy hardened infrastructure, monitor posture continuously, and generate assessor-ready proof from your running systems.

Redoubt Forge and Hyperproof both reduce the manual burden of compliance across multiple frameworks. Hyperproof organizes compliance programs through GRC workflows, evidence collection, and cross-framework control mapping. Redoubt Forge covers the full compliance lifecycle: build by scanning and identifying gaps, deploy hardened infrastructure, monitor security posture through continuous detection, and prove compliance with assessor-ready packages generated from running systems.

What Hyperproof Does Well

Hyperproof is a GRC operations platform founded in 2018 with over $67 million in funding and approximately $21 million in annual revenue. It supports 100+ pre-built frameworks, the largest count among the platforms in this analysis. Its Jumpstart feature provides cross-framework control mapping, allowing organizations to reuse evidence and controls across overlapping requirements. Hierarchical Scopes, launched in February 2026, let organizations scale compliance programs across business units, subsidiaries, and geographies from a single instance.

Hyperproof received FedRAMP Moderate authorization in March 2026 for its Hyperproof Gov product, making it one of the few GRC platforms authorized for use in federal environments. The platform integrates with 70+ third-party tools for evidence collection. In October 2025, Hyperproof acquired Expent.ai to add third-party risk management capabilities. Hyperproof AI, launched in September 2025, automates evidence testing and compliance reporting. Enterprise customers include Motorola Solutions, Fortinet, 3M, Instacart, and Reddit. The platform maintains a 4.5/5 rating on G2 with over 208 reviews. Hyperproof also provides FedRAMP templates for High, Moderate, and Low impact levels.

What Redoubt Forge Does

Redoubt Forge is a secure operations platform that spans four phases most compliance tools treat separately or ignore entirely.

Vanguard runs 14 native scanner types: SAST across multiple languages, DAST, SCA, secret scanning, container image scanning, STIG validation against 20+ technical benchmarks, CIS Benchmark scanning for OS, cloud, container, database, and web server targets, fuzzing, and API security. Scanning identifies gaps before you deploy anything.

Armory provides hardened Terraform modules pre-configured for specific framework controls. Garrison tracks your connected estate as infrastructure is provisioned. Deploy packs, capability packs, and IaC modules let you provision infrastructure that meets controls from the start.

Sentinel monitors infrastructure through event-driven detection. When a security group changes, an IAM policy updates, or a new resource deploys, Sentinel detects the change, re-evaluates posture against all mapped frameworks, and flags findings in Citadel. Evidence is generated from running systems on every change.

Rampart maps security posture to any framework and generates C3PAO-ready and 3PAO-ready assessment packages. Artificer produces OSCAL-formatted authorization packages for FedRAMP 20x: SSP, SAR, SAP, and POA&M documents with immutable evidence chains linking every control to the infrastructure state that satisfies it.

Where Both Platforms Overlap

Both platforms support multiple compliance frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, CMMC, FedRAMP, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, and NIST CSF 2.0. Both automate evidence collection. Both reduce the manual burden of maintaining compliance programs. Both provide dashboards for tracking control status and assessment readiness. Both support cross-framework control mapping to reduce duplicate effort.

How Redoubt Forge Goes Further

Hyperproof collects evidence through 70+ third-party integrations but does not include native scanning. Organizations must purchase, configure, and maintain separate scanning tools, then feed results into Hyperproof through integrations. Redoubt Forge includes 14 native scanner types through Vanguard. SAST across multiple languages, DAST, SCA, secret scanning, container image scanning, STIG validation against 20+ DISA technical benchmarks, CIS Benchmark scanning for OS, cloud, container, database, and web server targets, fuzzing, and API security. You find every gap before you deploy.

Compliance Generation

Hyperproof tracks compliance through workflows and evidence requests. Redoubt Forge generates compliance from security posture. Scanning identifies gaps. IaC closes them. Monitoring proves controls are active. The compliance proof is a byproduct of security operations, not a managed program.

Hyperproof does not provision infrastructure or provide remediation tooling. It identifies compliance gaps but relies on external teams and tools to close them. Redoubt Forge's Armory provides hardened Terraform modules pre-configured for specific framework controls. Garrison tracks your connected estate as resources are provisioned. Deploy packs and IaC modules support AWS GovCloud and air-gapped environments. You do not just discover gaps; you close them with infrastructure that meets controls from the start.

Real-Time Posture

Hyperproof collects evidence through integrations (70+). Redoubt Forge monitors posture through event-driven detection via Sentinel. Infrastructure changes trigger re-evaluation. Evidence is generated continuously from running systems, not collected on a schedule.

Hyperproof collects evidence on integration sync schedules. Between sync intervals, infrastructure changes go undetected. Redoubt Forge's Sentinel monitors infrastructure continuously through event-driven detection. When a security group changes, an IAM policy updates, or a new resource deploys, Sentinel detects the change, re-evaluates posture against all mapped frameworks, and flags findings in Citadel. Evidence is generated from running systems on every change, not collected on a schedule.

Assessment Output

Hyperproof manages compliance documentation and evidence requests. Redoubt Forge generates OSCAL-formatted authorization packages: SSP, SAR, SAP, POA&M with immutable evidence chains. Assessors get programmatic proof from infrastructure state, not managed document collections.

Both platforms generate compliance reports and documentation. Redoubt Forge goes further: Rampart maps security posture to any framework and generates C3PAO-ready and 3PAO-ready assessment packages. Artificer produces OSCAL-formatted authorization packages for FedRAMP 20x. SSP, SAR, SAP, POA&M documents with immutable evidence chains linking every control to the infrastructure state that satisfies it. Assessors get provenance, not assertions.

Both platforms support CMMC and FedRAMP. Hyperproof has 100+ frameworks and FedRAMP Moderate authorization for its own platform. The difference is depth. Redoubt Forge supports CMMC Level 1 through Level 3, FedRAMP at Low, Moderate, High, and LI-SaaS baselines. Redoubt Forge also covers frameworks and overlays Hyperproof does not: CNSSI 1253 for national security systems, DoD Impact Levels IL2 through IL6, ITAR and DFARS for export-controlled programs, StateRAMP, and RMF/FISMA. The overlay system lets organizations compose requirements: apply a DISA STIG overlay on top of NIST 800-53, layer a DoD Impact Level, add sector-specific controls. Hyperproof supports frameworks as flat lists without composition.

Redoubt Forge publishes all pricing: five tiers from $49/mo (Developer) to $2,499/mo (Enterprise), with all features, add-on costs, and seat prices listed. Hyperproof does not publish pricing; sales engagement is required. Third-party data indicates annual contracts ranging from approximately $12,000 to $54,000, with a median of approximately $40,000 per year.

When to Choose Hyperproof

If you need a GRC operations platform with 100+ pre-built frameworks. If you value FedRAMP Moderate authorization for the compliance platform itself. If you need enterprise-grade third-party risk management through the Expent.ai acquisition. If your organization manages compliance as a program across multiple business units with Hierarchical Scopes. If you need a mature GRC workflow tool with 70+ integrations for evidence collection across existing tools. Hyperproof is a strong choice for large organizations that treat compliance as a managed program.

When to Choose Redoubt Forge

If you need security posture to generate compliance, not workflows to manage it. If you need native scanning that validates DISA STIGs and CIS Benchmarks against your actual infrastructure. If you need to build compliant infrastructure through hardened Terraform modules, not just track gaps. If you need event-driven continuous monitoring that eliminates evidence decay. If you need overlay composition to layer DISA STIGs, DoD Impact Levels, and sector-specific controls on top of base frameworks. If you need OSCAL-formatted authorization packages for FedRAMP 20x. If you need GovCloud or air-gapped deployment. If you value transparent, published pricing starting at $49/mo compared to a median of approximately $40,000 per year.

Why Redoubt Forge

Hyperproof manages compliance programs. Redoubt Forge generates compliance from security posture. One organizes the evidence. The other produces it. When your compliance proof comes from running infrastructure, the program manages itself.

Side-by-side capabilities.

Redoubt Forge vs Hyperproof feature comparison across build, deploy, monitor, prove, and price dimensions.

Capability Redoubt Forge Hyperproof
Native Scanning 14 scanner types via Vanguard: SAST, DAST, SCA, secrets, containers, STIG, CIS, fuzzing, API security. Not available. Relies on 70+ third-party integrations for evidence.
STIG/CIS Validation 20+ DISA STIGs. CIS Benchmarks for OS, cloud, containers, databases, web servers. Not supported. No native scanning capability.
IaC Modules Hardened Terraform modules pre-configured for framework controls via Armory. Not available. GRC workflow platform.
Remediation Guided remediation with Artificer. Auto-remediation (after approval) via Sentinel. No automated remediation. Workflow-based task assignment.
GovCloud AWS GovCloud with full platform capability. FedRAMP Moderate authorized (Hyperproof Gov, March 2026).
Air-Gapped Supported for disconnected environments. Not available. SaaS-only.
Monitoring Model Event-driven via Sentinel. Detects change and re-evaluates posture in real-time. Integration sync schedules. Evidence collected on vendor-defined intervals.
Drift Detection Real-time. Fires event on every infrastructure change. Detected at next integration sync. Not real-time.
Evidence Collection Continuous from running systems. Immutable, timestamped, traceable to source. Integration-based. 70+ connectors. Hyperproof AI for automated evidence testing.
Commercial Frameworks SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, NIST CSF 2.0. 100+ pre-built frameworks. SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, NIST CSF 2.0, GDPR, HITRUST, and more.
Gov/Defense Frameworks CMMC Level 1-3, FedRAMP Low/Mod/High/LI-SaaS, NIST 800-53 rev5 (all baselines), NIST 800-171 rev2/rev3, CNSSI 1253, DoD IL2-IL6, ITAR, DFARS, StateRAMP, RMF. CMMC, FedRAMP (templates for High/Mod/Low), NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171. FedRAMP Moderate authorized. No CNSSI 1253, DoD IL, ITAR, DFARS, StateRAMP, or RMF.
Overlay Composition DISA SRGs, STIGs, CIS Benchmarks, DoD Cloud SRG, privacy, AI, sector, and organizational overlays. Composable. No overlay concept. Cross-framework Jumpstart mapping only.
OSCAL Output Native OSCAL for FedRAMP 20x. Not confirmed. Manages compliance documentation.
Assessor Packages C3PAO/3PAO-ready. SSP, SAR, SAP, POA&M. Immutable evidence chains. Compliance documentation management. Evidence request workflows. FedRAMP templates.
Pricing Model Published. $49-$2,499/mo. All tiers visible. Contact sales. ~$12K-$54K/year. Median ~$40K/year.
Entry Price $49/mo (Developer). ~$12,000/year (estimated).
Custom Frameworks Enterprise tier ($2,499/mo). Available. User-defined frameworks supported.

Common questions about Redoubt Forge and Hyperproof.

Is Hyperproof FedRAMP authorized?

Yes. Hyperproof received FedRAMP Moderate authorization in March 2026 for its Hyperproof Gov product. This means the Hyperproof platform itself is authorized for use in federal environments at the Moderate impact level. Redoubt Forge supports FedRAMP at all baselines (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS) with native OSCAL output for FedRAMP 20x but is not FedRAMP authorized for its own platform yet.

Does Hyperproof include native scanning or remediation?

No. Hyperproof is a GRC workflow platform that collects evidence through 70+ third-party integrations. It does not include native vulnerability scanning, STIG validation, or CIS Benchmark scanning. Redoubt Forge includes 14 native scanner types through Vanguard and provides hardened IaC modules through Armory to close the gaps scanning identifies.

How does Hyperproof's GRC workflow differ from posture-based compliance?

Hyperproof manages evidence collection, control mapping, and compliance documentation through workflows. Teams assign evidence requests, collect artifacts from integrated tools, and track completion through the platform. Redoubt Forge takes a different approach: Vanguard scans infrastructure to find gaps, Armory deploys hardened infrastructure to close them, Sentinel monitors posture continuously, and Rampart generates proof from running systems. The compliance proof is a byproduct of security operations.

Does Hyperproof generate OSCAL-formatted authorization packages?

Hyperproof manages compliance documentation and provides FedRAMP templates for High, Moderate, and Low impact levels. Native OSCAL output has not been confirmed. Redoubt Forge generates native OSCAL-formatted authorization packages for FedRAMP 20x through Artificer: SSP, SAR, SAP, and POA&M documents with immutable evidence chains linking every control to infrastructure state.

Which platform is better for managing both commercial and government frameworks?

Both platforms support commercial and government frameworks. Hyperproof has 100+ pre-built frameworks and FedRAMP Moderate authorization for the platform itself. Redoubt Forge has fewer frameworks but deeper government framework support with overlay composition, native STIG and CIS scanning, CNSSI 1253, DoD Impact Levels, ITAR, DFARS, and OSCAL output. The choice depends on whether you need breadth of framework coverage or depth of security posture generation.

Something is being forged.

The full platform is under active development. Reach out to learn more or get early access.